• Menu
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

The Cyber Security News

Latest Cyber Security News

Header Right

  • Latest News
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Cloud Services
A Google Docs Bug Could Have Allowed Hackers See Your

A Google Docs Bug Could Have Allowed Hackers See Your Private Documents

You are here: Home / General Cyber Security News / A Google Docs Bug Could Have Allowed Hackers See Your Private Documents
December 29, 2020

Google has patched a bug in its feedback tool integrated across its providers that could be exploited by an attacker to possibly steal screenshots of delicate Google Docs paperwork basically by embedding them in a destructive web-site.

The flaw was found on July 9 by security researcher Sreeram KL, for which he was awarded $3133.70 as component of Google’s Vulnerability Reward Software.

Several of Google’s solutions, like Google Docs, arrive with a “Send suggestions” or “Enable Docs boost” choice that makes it possible for customers to send out comments alongside with an solution to include a screenshot — some thing which is quickly loaded to spotlight specific issues.

✔ Approved From Our Partners
AOMEI Backupper Lifetime

Protect and backup your data using AOMEI Backupper. AOMEI Backupper takes secure and encrypted backups from your Windows, hard drives or partitions. With AOMEI Backupper you will never be worried about loosing your data anymore.

Get AOMEI Backupper with 72% discount from an authorized distrinutor of AOMEI: SerialCart® (Limited Offer).

➤ Activate Your Coupon Code


But rather of having to duplicate the identical operation throughout its products and services, the feedback feature is deployed in Google’s main website (“www.google.com”) and integrated to other domains by using an iframe ingredient that loads the pop-up’s content material from “suggestions.googleusercontent.com.”

This also usually means that every time a screenshot of the Google Docs window is included, rendering the image necessitates the transmission of RGB values of each and every pixel to the parent domain (www.google.com), which then redirects all those RGB values to the feedback’s area, which in the long run constructs the image and sends it back in Base64 encoded structure.

Sreeram, on the other hand, discovered a bug in the method these messages have been passed to “feedback.googleusercontent.com,” as a result enabling an attacker to modify the frame to an arbitrary, external internet site, and in convert, steal and hijack Google Docs screenshots which were intended to be uploaded to Google’s servers.

Notably, the flaw stems from a deficiency of X-Frame-Possibilities header in the Google Docs domain, which designed it probable to modify the goal origin of the message and exploit the cross-origin conversation amongst the webpage and the body contained in it.

Whilst the attack needs some form of user conversation — i.e. clicking the “Send out responses” button — an exploit could very easily leverage this weakness to capture the URL of the uploaded screenshot and exfiltrate it to a destructive internet site.

This can be achieved by embedding a Google Docs file in an iFrame on a rogue website and hijacking the feedback pop-up body to redirect the contents to a area of the attacker’s preference.

Failing to offer a concentrate on origin through cross-origin communication raises security worries in that it discloses the details that is sent to any web page.

“Generally specify an actual goal origin, not *, when you use postMessage to ship data to other windows,” Mozilla documentation states. “A destructive web-site can modify the locale of the window with out your information, and consequently it can intercept the details sent applying postMessage.”

Located this post intriguing? Observe THN on Fb, Twitter  and LinkedIn to browse a lot more special material we publish.


Some parts of this report are sourced from:
thehackernews.com

Previous Post: «Autohotkey Based Password Stealer Targeting Us, Canadian Banking Users AutoHotkey-Based Password Stealer Targeting US, Canadian Banking Users
Next Post: 2020 Work-for-Home Shift: What We Learned 2020 Work For Home Shift: What We Learned»

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Report This Article

Recent Posts

  • Zero-Click Agentic Browser Attack Can Delete Entire Google Drive Using Crafted Emails
  • Critical XXE Bug CVE-2025-66516 (CVSS 10.0) Hits Apache Tika, Requires Urgent Patch
  • Chinese Hackers Have Started Exploiting the Newly Disclosed React2Shell Vulnerability
  • Intellexa Leaks Reveal Zero-Days and Ads-Based Vector for Predator Spyware Delivery
  • “Getting to Yes”: An Anti-Sales Guide for MSPs
  • CISA Reports PRC Hackers Using BRICKSTORM for Long-Term Access in U.S. Systems
  • JPCERT Confirms Active Command Injection Attacks on Array AG Gateways
  • Silver Fox Uses Fake Microsoft Teams Installer to Spread ValleyRAT Malware in China
  • ThreatsDay Bulletin: Wi-Fi Hack, npm Worm, DeFi Theft, Phishing Blasts— and 15 More Stories
  • 5 Threats That Reshaped Web Security This Year [2025]

Copyright © TheCyberSecurity.News, All Rights Reserved.