• Menu
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

The Cyber Security News

Latest Cyber Security News

Header Right

  • Latest News
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Cloud Services
cert in mandates 12 hour patching for internet facing flaws amid ai assisted attacks

CERT-In Mandates 12-Hour Patching for Internet-Facing Flaws Amid AI-Assisted Attacks

You are here: Home / General Cyber Security News / CERT-In Mandates 12-Hour Patching for Internet-Facing Flaws Amid AI-Assisted Attacks
May 26, 2026

The Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In) has issued new guidelines requiring organizations to patch critical security vulnerabilities in internet-exposed systems within 12 hours of being flagged where “feasible” to safeguard against potential threats stemming from threat actors’ abuse of artificial intelligence (AI) tools and large language models (LLMs) to automate vulnerability discovery and exploitation, and enhance the scale and velocity of cyber attacks.

“AI-assisted cyber exploitation reduces the time required for adversaries to identify, weaponize, and exploit vulnerabilities, exposed services, weak identities, insecure APIs, and misconfigured systems,” CERT-In said in a 38-page blueprint published Monday.

“As organizations become increasingly dependent on interconnected digital infrastructure, cloud ecosystems, software supply chains, operational technologies, and AI-enabled platforms, the potential impact of AI-enabled cyber threats continues to increase across sectors.”

✔ Approved From Our Partners
AOMEI Backupper Lifetime

Protect and backup your data using AOMEI Backupper. AOMEI Backupper takes secure and encrypted backups from your Windows, hard drives or partitions. With AOMEI Backupper you will never be worried about loosing your data anymore.

Get AOMEI Backupper with 72% discount from an authorized distrinutor of AOMEI: SerialCart® (Limited Offer).

➤ Activate Your Coupon Code


With threat actors beginning to increasingly rely on AI for a wide range of tasks, including attack surface discovery, exploit analysis, convincing phishing content, and even malware generation, they can significantly compress attack preparation timelines and bypass traditional security controls.

Furthermore, AI-enabled systems may themselves become targets of malicious attacks via prompt injections, data leakage vulnerabilities, jailbreaking techniques, model manipulation, training data poisoning, model theft, and orchestration pipeline compromises, effectively undermining their confidentiality and integrity.

Cybersecurity

CERT-In has warned that organizations should expect exploitation timelines to collapse significantly and attacks to become autonomous, necessitating the need for adopting heightened cybersecurity measures that involve continuous threat assessment, proactive exposure reduction, and operational preparedness.

Some of the defensive principles outlined by the cybersecurity agency to reduce exposure and better respond to AI-assisted cyber threats are listed below –

  • Assume breach and prepare for rapid detection, containment, and recovery from compromise scenarios.
  • Adopt a Zero Trust approach by enforcing continuous verification and least-privilege access.
  • Implement a defense-in-depth strategy with layered controls across infrastructure to eliminate single points of failure and minimize the overall impact of a successful breach.
  • Monitor and reduce exposure to security vulnerabilities.
  • Embed a secure-by-design paradigm into systems, applications, and AI workflows.
  • Maintain operational continuity during cyber incidents and disruption scenarios.
  • Safeguard sensitive and operationally critical data throughout its lifecycle.
  • Reduce software supply chain risks arising from third-party software, AI models, and dependencies through SBOM, provenance
  • validation, and assessments.
  • Test security effectiveness against evolving threats through red teaming, vulnerability assessments, penetration testing, and independent audits.
  • Prioritize controls based on operational criticality and threat exposure.
  • Establish formal governance mechanisms regarding the use of AI systems.
  • Maintain visibility into AI systems, integrations, and operational behavior.

“Organizations should implement layered, risk-based, and continuously validated technical controls to reduce exposure to AI-assisted cyber threats,” CERT-In said. “Controls should prioritise protection of internet-facing systems, critical business applications, identities, cloud environments, APIs, sensitive data, AI-enabled systems, and operational infrastructure.”

The agency is also urging organizations to embrace “continuous, risk-based vulnerability and patch management practices” to reduce exposure arising from security flaws, misconfigurations, insecure APIs, publicly-accessible services, and weak identities. To that end, known exploited vulnerabilities affecting internet-facing and critical systems should be remediated within 12 hours where applicable.

Other risk-based remediation times are as follows –

  • Critical externally exposed vulnerabilities: Within 1 day
  • Known exploited vulnerabilities affecting internal systems: Within 1 day unless other mitigations are implemented and documented
  • Critical internal vulnerabilities affecting high-value systems: Within 3 days
  • High-severity vulnerabilities: Within 5 days based on risk prioritization

In scenarios where no patches are immediately available, it’s advised to implement temporary mitigations such as isolation, access restriction, WAF/API protection, enhanced monitoring, or feature disablement until the fix is released.

Cybersecurity

“Given the rapidly evolving nature of AI-assisted cyber threats, organisations should continuously reassess exposure, validate security controls, strengthen resilience capabilities, and enhance operational preparedness through ongoing audits, monitoring, testing, and coordinated cybersecurity governance,” CERT-In said.

The blueprint arrives a month after CERT-In released an advisory warning of the growing cyber capabilities of frontier AI models from Anthropic and OpenAI, stating how their “dual-use nature” could “lower the barrier to entry for malicious cyber actors and be leveraged to accelerate attack execution, automate exploitation workflows and scale cyber campaigns.”

“Keeping pace with frontier AI-driven cyber developments is critical for maintaining cyber resilience,” it added. “Baseline cybersecurity controls remain critical and should be rigorously enforced.”

Found this article interesting? Follow us on Google News, Twitter and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post.


Some parts of this article are sourced from:
thehackernews.com

Previous Post: «iranian hackers deploy minifast and minijunk v2 via phishing and Iranian Hackers Deploy MiniFast and MiniJunk V2 via Phishing and SEO Poisoning

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Report This Article

Recent Posts

  • CERT-In Mandates 12-Hour Patching for Internet-Facing Flaws Amid AI-Assisted Attacks
  • Iranian Hackers Deploy MiniFast and MiniJunk V2 via Phishing and SEO Poisoning
  • KnowledgeDeliver LMS Flaw Exploited to Deploy Godzilla and Cobalt Strike
  • ⚡ Weekly Recap: Linux Flaws, Defender 0-Days, Router Botnets, and Supply Chain Chaos
  • Ghost CMS CVE-2026-26980 Exploited to Hijack 700+ Sites for ClickFix Attacks
  • The Alert Firehose Finally Meets Its Match
  • Lazarus Deploys RemotePE Memory-Only RAT Against Financial and Crypto Firms
  • TrapDoor Supply Chain Attack Spreads Credential-Stealing Malware via npm, PyPI, and CratesIO
  • npm Adds 2FA-Gated Publishing and Package Install Controls Against Supply Chain Attacks
  • Packagist Supply Chain Attack Infects 8 Packages Using GitHub-Hosted Linux Malware May 23, 2026 Malware / DevSecOps A new "coordinated" supply chain attack campaign has impacted eight packages on Packagist including malicious code designed to run a Linux binary retrieved from a GitHub Releases URL. "Although the affected packages were all Composer packages, the malicious code was not added to composer.json," Socket said . "Instead, it was inserted into package.json, targeting projects that ship JavaScript build tooling alongside PHP code." This "cross-ecosystem placement" makes the activity stand out because developers and security teams scanning PHP dependencies may only focus on Composer-related metadata, while skipping package.json lifecycle hooks that are bundled within the package. The malicious versions have since been removed from Packagist. An analysis of the packages has uncovered that their upstream repositories have been modified to include a postinstall script that attempts to download a Linux binary from a GitHub Releases URL ("github[…

Copyright © TheCyberSecurity.News, All Rights Reserved.