• Menu
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

The Cyber Security News

Latest Cyber Security News

Header Right

  • Latest News
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Cloud Services
unsecured tunneling protocols expose 4.2 million hosts, including vpns and

Unsecured Tunneling Protocols Expose 4.2 Million Hosts, Including VPNs and Routers

You are here: Home / General Cyber Security News / Unsecured Tunneling Protocols Expose 4.2 Million Hosts, Including VPNs and Routers
January 20, 2025

New research has uncovered security vulnerabilities in multiple tunneling protocols that could allow attackers to perform a wide range of attacks.

“Internet hosts that accept tunneling packets without verifying the sender’s identity can be hijacked to perform anonymous attacks and provide access to their networks,” Top10VPN said in a study, as part of a collaboration with KU Leuven professor and researcher Mathy Vanhoef.

As many as 4.2 million hosts have been found susceptible to the attacks, including VPN servers, ISP home routers, core internet routers, mobile network gateways, and content delivery network (CDN) nodes. China, France, Japan, the U.S., and Brazil top the list of the most affected countries.

✔ Approved From Our Partners
AOMEI Backupper Lifetime

Protect and backup your data using AOMEI Backupper. AOMEI Backupper takes secure and encrypted backups from your Windows, hard drives or partitions. With AOMEI Backupper you will never be worried about loosing your data anymore.

Get AOMEI Backupper with 72% discount from an authorized distrinutor of AOMEI: SerialCart® (Limited Offer).

➤ Activate Your Coupon Code


Successful exploitation of the shortcomings could permit an adversary to abuse a susceptible system as one-way proxies, as well as conduct denial-of-service (DoS) attacks.

Cybersecurity

“An adversary can abuse these security vulnerabilities to create one-way proxies and spoof source IPv4/6 addresses,” the CERT Coordination Center (CERT/CC) said in an advisory. “Vulnerable systems may also allow access to an organization’s private network or be abused to perform DDoS attacks.”

The vulnerabilities are rooted in the fact that the tunneling protocols such as IP6IP6, GRE6, 4in6, and 6in4, which are mainly used to facilitate data transfers between two disconnected networks, do not authenticate and encrypt traffic without adequate security protocols like Internet Protocol Security (IPsec).

The absence of additional security guardrails opens the door to a scenario where an attacker can inject malicious traffic into a tunnel, a variation of a flaw that was previously flagged in 2020 (CVE-2020-10136).

They have been assigned the following CVE identifiers for the protocols in question –

  • CVE-2024-7595 (GRE and GRE6)
  • CVE-2024-7596 (Generic UDP Encapsulation)
  • CVE-2025-23018 (IPv4-in-IPv6 and IPv6-in-IPv6)
  • CVE-2025-23019 (IPv6-in-IPv4)

“An attacker simply needs to send a packet encapsulated using one of the affected protocols with two IP headers,” Top10VPN’s Simon Migliano explained.

Cybersecurity

“The outer header contains the attacker’s source IP with the vulnerable host’s IP as the destination. The inner header’s source IP is that of the vulnerable host IP rather than the attacker. The destination IP is that of the target of the anonymous attack.”

Thus when the vulnerable host receives the malicious packet, it automatically strips the outer IP address header and forwards the inner packet to its destination. Given that the source IP address on the inner packet is that of the vulnerable but trusted host, it’s able to get past network filters.

As defenses, it’s recommended to use IPSec or WireGuard to provide authentication and encryption, and only accept tunneling packets from trusted sources. At the network level, it’s also advised to implement traffic filtering on routers and middleboxes, carry out Deep packet inspection (DPI), and block all unencrypted tunneling packets.

“The impact on victims of these DoS attacks can include network congestion, service disruption as resources are consumed by the traffic overload, and crashing of overloaded network devices,” Migliano said. “It also opens up opportunities for further exploitation, such as man-in-the-middle attacks and data interception.”

Found this article interesting? Follow us on Twitter  and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post.


Some parts of this article are sourced from:
thehackernews.com

Previous Post: «donot team linked to new tanzeem android malware targeting intelligence DoNot Team Linked to New Tanzeem Android Malware Targeting Intelligence Collection
Next Post: CERT-UA Warns of Cyber Scams Using Fake AnyDesk Requests for Fraudulent Security Audits cert ua warns of cyber scams using fake anydesk requests for»

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Report This Article

Recent Posts

  • Over 269,000 Websites Infected with JSFireTruck JavaScript Malware in One Month
  • Ransomware Gangs Exploit Unpatched SimpleHelp Flaws to Target Victims with Double Extortion
  • CTEM is the New SOC: Shifting from Monitoring Alerts to Measuring Risk
  • Apple Zero-Click Flaw in Messages Exploited to Spy on Journalists Using Paragon Spyware
  • WordPress Sites Turned Weapon: How VexTrio and Affiliates Run a Global Scam Network
  • New TokenBreak Attack Bypasses AI Moderation with Single-Character Text Changes
  • AI Agents Run on Secret Accounts — Learn How to Secure Them in This Webinar
  • Zero-Click AI Vulnerability Exposes Microsoft 365 Copilot Data Without User Interaction
  • Non-Human Identities: How to Address the Expanding Security Risk
  • ConnectWise to Rotate ScreenConnect Code Signing Certificates Due to Security Risks

Copyright © TheCyberSecurity.News, All Rights Reserved.