• Menu
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

The Cyber Security News

Latest Cyber Security News

Header Right

  • Latest News
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Cloud Services
ftc slams avast with $16.5 million fine for selling users'

FTC Slams Avast with $16.5 Million Fine for Selling Users’ Browsing Data

You are here: Home / General Cyber Security News / FTC Slams Avast with $16.5 Million Fine for Selling Users’ Browsing Data
February 23, 2024

The U.S. Federal Trade Fee (FTC) has hit antivirus seller Avast with a $16.5 million good over prices that the business bought users’ searching knowledge to advertisers just after proclaiming its products would block on the net tracking.

In addition, the business has been banned from marketing or licensing any web searching information for promotion needs. It will also have to notify consumers whose browsing knowledge was marketed to third parties with out their consent.

The FTC, in its criticism, explained Avast “unfairly collected consumers’ browsing data as a result of the company’s browser extensions and antivirus software program, stored it indefinitely, and marketed it without having sufficient detect and without the need of purchaser consent.”

✔ Approved From Our Partners
AOMEI Backupper Lifetime

Protect and backup your data using AOMEI Backupper. AOMEI Backupper takes secure and encrypted backups from your Windows, hard drives or partitions. With AOMEI Backupper you will never be worried about loosing your data anymore.

Get AOMEI Backupper with 72% discount from an authorized distrinutor of AOMEI: SerialCart® (Limited Offer).

➤ Activate Your Coupon Code


It also accused the U.K.-primarily based business of deceiving customers by boasting that the computer software would block 3rd-party tracking and safeguard users’ privacy, but failing to tell them that it would offer their “in-depth, re-identifiable searching details” to additional than 100 third-parties by means of its Jumpshot subsidiary.

Cybersecurity

What’s much more, facts consumers could affiliate non-individually identifiable data with Avast users’ browsing details, making it possible for other firms to track and associate customers and their searching histories with other info they by now had.

The misleading knowledge privacy practice came to light-weight in January 2020 subsequent a joint investigation by Motherboard and PCMag, contacting out Google, Yelp, Microsoft, McKinsey, Pepsi, Property Depot, Condé Nast, and Intuit as some of Jumpshot’s “past, existing, and possible consumers.”

A month in advance of, web browsers Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, and Opera taken out Avast’s browser include-ons from their respective stores, with prior investigation from security researcher Wladimir Palant in October 2019 deeming these extensions as spyware.

The details, which includes a user’s Google lookups, spot lookups, and internet footprint, was collected by way of the Avast antivirus application mounted on a person’s computer devoid of looking for their informed consent.

“Browsing data [sold by Jumpshot] bundled details about users’ web queries and the web internet pages they frequented – revealing consumers’ spiritual beliefs, wellness problems, political leanings, site, monetary position, visits to baby-directed written content and other sensitive info,” the FTC alleged.

Jumpshot explained by itself as the “only organization that unlocks walled backyard facts,” and claimed to have knowledge from as many as 100 million devices as of August 2018. The searching information is reported to have been collected considering the fact that at minimum 2014.

Cybersecurity

The privacy backlash prompted Avast to “terminate the Jumpshot details collection and wind down Jumpshot’s operations, with speedy effect.”

Avast has since merged with another cybersecurity firm NortonLifeLock to form a new dad or mum corporation named Gen Electronic, which also features other solutions like AVG, Avira, and CCleaner.

“Avast promised customers that its items would secure the privacy of their searching facts but shipped the reverse,” stated Samuel Levine, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Safety. “Avast’s bait-and-switch surveillance ways compromised consumers’ privacy and broke the law.”

Observed this write-up exciting? Comply with us on Twitter  and LinkedIn to examine much more exclusive content material we post.


Some areas of this article are sourced from:
thehackernews.com

Previous Post: «apple unveils pq3 protocol post quantum encryption for imessage Apple Unveils PQ3 Protocol – Post-Quantum Encryption for iMessage
Next Post: Researchers Detail Apple’s Recent Zero-Click Shortcuts Vulnerability researchers detail apple's recent zero click shortcuts vulnerability»

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Report This Article

Recent Posts

  • Over 269,000 Websites Infected with JSFireTruck JavaScript Malware in One Month
  • Ransomware Gangs Exploit Unpatched SimpleHelp Flaws to Target Victims with Double Extortion
  • CTEM is the New SOC: Shifting from Monitoring Alerts to Measuring Risk
  • Apple Zero-Click Flaw in Messages Exploited to Spy on Journalists Using Paragon Spyware
  • WordPress Sites Turned Weapon: How VexTrio and Affiliates Run a Global Scam Network
  • New TokenBreak Attack Bypasses AI Moderation with Single-Character Text Changes
  • AI Agents Run on Secret Accounts — Learn How to Secure Them in This Webinar
  • Zero-Click AI Vulnerability Exposes Microsoft 365 Copilot Data Without User Interaction
  • Non-Human Identities: How to Address the Expanding Security Risk
  • ConnectWise to Rotate ScreenConnect Code Signing Certificates Due to Security Risks

Copyright © TheCyberSecurity.News, All Rights Reserved.