• Menu
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

The Cyber Security News

Latest Cyber Security News

Header Right

  • Latest News
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Cloud Services
google fined $971k for litigation misconduct in privacy suit

Google fined $971k for litigation misconduct in privacy suit

You are here: Home / General Cyber Security News / Google fined $971k for litigation misconduct in privacy suit
July 18, 2022

Shutterstock

An order issued by a US judge on Friday mandates Google to fork out over $971,000 in authorized service fees and expenses as component of litigation misconduct in a lawsuit submitted in the Northern District of California.

“The plaintiffs’ lawyers at Boies Schiller Flexner and other firms experienced sought more than $1 million in costs and fees, right after US Justice of the peace Choose Susan van Keulen in San Jose, California, a federal court docket in Could located Google experienced failed to timely disclose some items of proof,” documented Reuters. 

✔ Approved From Our Partners
AOMEI Backupper Lifetime

Protect and backup your data using AOMEI Backupper. AOMEI Backupper takes secure and encrypted backups from your Windows, hard drives or partitions. With AOMEI Backupper you will never be worried about loosing your data anymore.

Get AOMEI Backupper with 72% discount from an authorized distrinutor of AOMEI: SerialCart® (Limited Offer).

➤ Activate Your Coupon Code


Back again in 2020, Google was hit with a $5 billion privacy lawsuit about allegations of tracking users’ knowledge when in private or incognito manner. The penalty resulted from Google’s “failure to well timed identify witnesses, added paperwork and knowledge sources suitable to this litigation,” Decide Keulen stated in a preceding get. Nonetheless, Google has denied the allegation. 

Per billing reports submitted in the situation, Boies Schiller Flexner founder David Boies’ hourly rate accounts for $1,950. Altogether, he sought compensation for 49 hours, or about $96,000.

Google’s lawyers at Quinn Emanuel argued the plaintiffs experienced not available a “justification for their determination to have David Boies get up to speed to argue the complicated issues in the sanctions motion.”

Andrew Schapiro, just one of Google’s lawyers, mentioned in a statement that the plaintiffs “ended up seeking severe sanctions and, at the finish of the working day, they are receiving a partial payment of their inflated invoice for the time they devoted to bringing the movement.”

As matters stand, a listening to is set for September for the Brown v Google case.


Some areas of this report are sourced from:
www.itpro.co.uk

Previous Post: «pegasus spyware used to hack devices of pro democracy activists in Pegasus Spyware Used to Hack Devices of Pro-Democracy Activists in Thailand
Next Post: Pegasus Spyware Used Against Thailand’s Pro-Democracy Movement Cyber Security News»

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Report This Article

Recent Posts

  • Cybercriminals Using New ASMCrypt Malware Loader Flying Under the Radar
  • Lazarus Group Impersonates Recruiter from Meta to Target Spanish Aerospace Firm
  • Post-Quantum Cryptography: Finally Real in Consumer Apps?
  • Microsoft’s AI-Powered Bing Chat Ads May Lead Users to Malware-Distributing Sites
  • Progress Software Releases Urgent Hotfixes for Multiple Security Flaws in WS_FTP Server
  • Cisco Warns of Vulnerability in IOS and IOS XE Software After Exploitation Attempts
  • GitHub Repositories Hit by Password-Stealing Commits Disguised as Dependabot Contributions
  • China’s BlackTech Hacking Group Exploited Routers to Target U.S. and Japanese Companies
  • The Dark Side of Browser Isolation – and the Next Generation Browser Security Technologies
  • China-Linked Budworm Targeting Middle Eastern Telco and Asian Government Agencies

Copyright © TheCyberSecurity.News, All Rights Reserved.